| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Whenever you search in PBworks or on the Web, Dokkio Sidebar (from the makers of PBworks) will run the same search in your Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Gmail, Slack, and browsed web pages. Now you can find what you're looking for wherever it lives. Try Dokkio Sidebar for free.

View
 

rubric finalpaper

Page history last edited by abogado 3 years, 11 months ago

Law 34 Grading Rubric for Final Research and Writing Paper

see format of final paper at
http://profjordan.pbworks.com/format 

 

WARNING: If you copy directly from WIKIPEDIA this is plagiarism.

 

The A Paper

* Provides a cohesive and well argued "thesis"

* Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from the five (5) court cases or codes provided in the paper

* Maintains focus & avoids being sidetracked by tangents

* Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner

* Does much more than merely restate the thesis and offer a brief response

* Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems

· Very well written with sound grammar and spelling

· Paper has clear introductory thesis and effective topic sentences

· Demonstrates creativity

· Provides at least 5 court cases or codes

· Analyzes issues and advances an argument throughout the paper 


 

The B Paper

· Good writing skills, some grammatical/spelling mistakes

· Has an overall theme, but the arguments and evidence are not so sophisticated

· Reasonably well structured but introductory thesis and topic sentences less clear

· Answers all questions from the assignment, but lacks some critical reflection

· Draws upon at least 5 court cases or codes, citing them effectively and properly using case citation format.


 

The C Paper

· Mediocre writing skills, evident grammatical and spelling mistakes

· Lacks an overall theme

· Poorly structured with no evident introductory thesis and topic sentences

· Lacks critical reflection and/or arguments not entirely clear

· Answers most questions from the assignment but not all

· Description of cases or codes lack details, few mentioned specifically

· Poor integration of legal materials and readings

· Draws upon at least 5 cases, citing them effectively and properly using case citation format.


 

The D paper

· Very poorly structured with no evident introductory and concluding statements

· No critical reflection and/or confusing arguments

· Very poor writing skills, replete with grammatical and spelling mistakes

· Completely lacks integration

· Does not have a thesis and does not mention at least 5 court cases and codes

· Poor description of the court cases or codes, generalities

· Very poor to no integration of source case or code materials and readings or has less than 5 court cases or codes, or does not give complete and correct case citations for each of the 5 cases or codes.


 

The F paper

· No critical reflection and/or confusing arguments. Plagiarism!

  • no cases cited in your paper and analyzed. papers with no cases receive a 0 for the paper. 

 

Your Final Papers will be checked with a Plagiarism Checker, so please DO NOT plagiarize.   Use your own words, and create your own work.


 


 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.